Hispanic Immigrant in United States has always
been a problem; however, Pizza Patron starts accepting people to use pesos with
dollars and credit card to purchase pizza. The head of Pizza Patron wants to
give convenience to consumers who possess pesos. And from my point of view, I
think the idea of pizza for pesos relate to utility because this economic
strategy might attract consumers who accept or like Hispanic culture;
conversely, it might also distract to consumers who does not have inclination
to Hispanic culture. According to the video, we can see that many consumers are
complaining that Pizza Patron accept pesos, because accepting pesos in American
can undermine American culture. Illegal immigrant has already been a problem;
therefore, this acceptance might just escalate the problem. Exchange rate is
considered as another serious problem. By exchanging dollars from USD to Pesos,
supplier and consumer will eventually cause a gap between accuracy and fairness
of exchange rate. In other words, using different currency might make the
trading more intricate or cause unnecessary problem. Why illegal immigration is
such a big concern? Statistically, nowadays there are 800 billions dollars in
Hispanic market, which means American’s jobs are being undermined by this
immigration.
Friday, October 26, 2012
Thursday, October 18, 2012
Topic 11: Brand Names And Utility
In nowadays society, people have certain
inclination to buy certain product. By looking at the demonstration in the
video, even though there are many kinds of peanut butter, consumers still
choose the one that might be the cheapest. Choosing cheap product not only
because consumers want to save money but also because consumers seem to care
about products' price more than products' brand. Personally, I don't have high
utility on buying famous brand of food. I can easily be satisfied as long as I
think food's quality is as same as its price. However, sometimes, I have high
utility on buying clothing stuff. Comparing my demand curves with non-name
products, I will not buy non-name products, even though it is sold in a low price.
Conversely, if it's famous brand such as Nike, or Adidas, then my quantity of
demand will increase while the price of the clothes is decreasing. For
instance, if a Nike T-shirt costs 1000, I will probably only buy one; however,
if the price of T-shirt decreases, then I will probably go for two. In
conclusion, every people have different utility towards different products;
therefore, companies have to figure out what product they made can attract most
of people with high utility.
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Topic 10: Consumer Preference and Utility
In this contemporary society, sellers have
been using different attractive and intelligent strategies in order to get
consumers’ attention. For instance, nowadays teenagers from age 12 to 24 have
tendency to buy products Skechers not only because it’s fashionable but also
because it’s comfortable. Using advertising in magazine, Skechers Company is
trying to promote its products by passing down information from one to another.
In order to be the most competitive, Skechers Company has been inventing
creative product such as roller blades, and leather boots. Creativity is
essential in contemporary market, especially for teenagers. Skechers had
located many stores in New York and Los Angeles, where are considered as one of
the most popular and famous cities. In such urban area, Skechers believe they
will receive more consumers. Skechers’ strategy was successful, because once it
spreads out the popularity of its product, teenagers will tend to buy more not
only because they become permanent consumers but also because their friends
affect them to buy. Personally, I have high utility on Apple products.
Actually, I think many people have high utility on Apple products. Apple
Company has been innovatively created many new electronic products, which are
both more useful and stylish than other products. For the products that I have
low utility but other might have higher are scissors for cutting hair. One of
the most expensive scissor can cost as much as iPhone.
Saturday, October 13, 2012
Topic 9: The Myth of Outsourcing's Effect
Globalization, comparative advantage and outsourcing are closely associated with each other. Famous companies like Nike, Adidas or Apple demonstrate great example of the connection among globalization, comparative advantage and outsourcing. In order to benefit its own comparative advantage, big company is globally looking for cheap labors, who can provide good service while receiving minimum wage. By having outsourcing, big company provoked a tendency of losing jobs in its own country. More and more people's jobs were replaced by those cheap labors, who lived in China or India. Those outsourcing requires physical strength, which means labors do not have to possess any skill. Of course, due to the huge populations, famous companies started moving their factors to China or India in order to hire cheap labors. The more labors a company has the more product the company will produce. Once the quantity of supply increases, the price of supply will gradually decrease. Outsourcing has to do with opportunity cost, as I mentioned earlier, because the companies can maximizing their benefit while minimizing their cost. Statistically, even though people seem to lose their jobs in their country, outsourcing literally created more job opportunities in other countries. By looking at the data provided in video, we can see Job Lost goes up to 391 million; however, Created job goes up to 411 million, which is higher than Job Lost. Therefore, people seem to fight against the outsourcing in their countries; conversely, outsourcing allowed 20 million people to have jobs within 4 years. According to the video, outsourcing shouldn't be a problem until people start thinking to stop it.
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Topic 8: Debate on Globalization
In this contemporary society, many
developed countries have tendency to hire those cheap employees from huge population
countries such as China and India; therefore, those employers can maximize
their benefits by minimizing the cost of labors. Globalization, in terms of
economics, can be defined as beginning to operate business throughout the
world. Developed countries, such as United States, established many factors
with labors from both India and China; unfairly, those labors normally will
receive a minimum wages. By looking at this video, we know the issue is more associated
with macroeconomics, which symbolizes national economics, and the video also
demonstrates the interaction between two countries can cause great global
influences.
Friday, October 5, 2012
Topic 7: Government Farm Subsidies
Even though
government provides subsidies to producers, who are farmers, producers don’t
think passing this bill of giving subsidies is a good idea, because those
farmers are considered as rich people, who earn twice what the average American
earns. And I strongly disagree with this assumption, because I think government
shouldn’t offer money to rich people; conversely, government should offer those
subsidies to poor people in order to let them have more opportunities to find
new jobs or live with better lives. People, who have own farmlands but are not
farmers, also received subsidies, because government want to suppress the
growth of crops. Looking at the video, we can obviously tell the reason why
some politicians support this assumption of giving out subsidies to crop
framers is that they want to win the elections. Subsidy was come from citizen’s
taxes; therefore, the government should provide subsidies to organizations such
as colleges, and universities, in which can benefit people the most. Yes,
people who don’t have school aged children should also pay taxes to support
schools; as a result of those people were once students, and in order to form
an equal society, all the people, who supposed to pay taxes, should pay taxes
to government; however people also have rights to affect government’s decision
of how to use those taxes.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)